By Π¦ΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΠΈΡ Π°ΠΉΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΠΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π¦ΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ², 2023
ΠΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ½Π° ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡ ΠΈ ΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π‘Π‘Π‘Π ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠ° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π° Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π»Π° Π‘ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π¦ΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π½Π° Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ , ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ Π‘ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΈ Π½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π³ΡΠ°Π΄, ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ²ΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ 1930-Ρ β Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π° 1950-Ρ Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΡ ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΡ Π΅ΠΌ.
Dmitry Tsyganov, 2023
The aesthetic canon of the Stalin era and the interplay of politics and aesthetics in the post-war USSR are central yet underexplored aspects of cultural history. This book investigates the institutions that bridged the political and aesthetic spheres and the role of the Stalin Prize in literature and art. Dmitry Tsyganov offers the first study based entirely on archival sources, providing a detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the institutional framework of the Stalin Prize for Literature. The author examines the operational details of the Prize Committee and award nuances, reconstructing key cultural trends that shaped the socialist realist literary project. By illustrating the complex interplay of institutions that formed the Stalinist era's canon, the research moves beyond simplistic interpretations to offer a more integrated view of the literary process from the 1930s to the early 1950s.